Labor and Employment
Overview
Our sound counsel resolves issues quickly and favorably, helping prevent damage to an employer’s relationships with its employees and the public. We advise and represent employers in almost every area of labor and employment law, and have an exceptional track record exemplified by satisfied clients and successful court decisions.
We advise public and private employers on federal and state labor and employment laws, emphasizing timely service and a prudent approach that will help you avoid future legal disputes. Our approach to advising our clients is grounded in our understanding that finding creative solutions often yields a better result than simply stating legal concerns or “saying no.” We use our knowledge and broad experience to identify these creative solutions.
Subpractices
People
Publications
- California Supreme Court Orders Disclosure by Public Agencies of Employee Home Addresses and Telephone Numbers to Representative Labor Unions
- Appellate Court Holds that Due Process Prevents Partners From the Same Law Firm From Serving as Adviser and Advocate on Contested Hearings
- Ninth Circuit Permits Plaintiffs One More Chance to Amend Retiree Healthcare Lawsuit
- U.S. Supreme Court to Determine the Meaning of "Changing Clothes"
- Court Approves Pregnancy Discrimination Action Under FEHA Even After Exhaustion of Required PDLL Leave
- Daily Journal Lists Booker v. City of Richmond Verdict, Handled by Meyers Nave, on its Top Verdicts List of 2012
- CalPERS Seeks to Prevent City of San Bernardino From Using Bankruptcy to Avoid Meeting Pension Payment Obligations
- Whistleblowers Beware: Violations of a Charter City's Municipal Law Are Not Violations of State Law For Purposes of Labor Code Section 1102.5(c)
- "Strenuous Duties" May Be Essential Functions Even For Administrative Sworn-Officer Positions
- Daily Journal Recognizes Two Meyers Nave Principals as “Top 25 Municipal Lawyers” in California for 2012
- California Court Rejects Honest-Belief Defense To CFRA "Interference" Claim
- Supreme Court Considering Definition of “Supervisor” in Workplace Harassment
- MOU Language Precludes City from Unilaterally Changing Retiree Health Benefit
- How Will PEPRA Affect Retired Annuitants?
- Governor Brown Signs Workplace Religion Freedom Act of 2012, Expanding Protections for Religious Freedom Under California's Fair Employment and Housing Act
- Governor Brown Signs AB 2386, Which Clarifying that FEHA’s Definition of “Sex” Includes “Breastfeeding and Conditions Relating to Breastfeeding”
- New California Privacy Law Restricts Access to Employees' Social Media Accounts
- Meyers Nave Principal Art Hartinger Named to Daily Journal’s Prestigious Top 100 List
- Meyers Nave Principal Art Hartinger Named to Daily Journal’s Prestigious Top 100 List
- Second Circuit Rules Undocumented Hours Count Toward FMLA Eligibility
- District Court Grants Summary Judgment Again for Orange County in its Retiree Medical Litigation
- Statement From Mayor Reed Regarding San Jose’s Pension Ballot Measure Vote
- Use of Criminal Records in Hiring
- EEOC Issues Guidance Regarding The Consideration Of Criminal Records In Employment Decisions
- League of California Cities Appoints Three Meyers Nave Attorneys to Serve on its Post-Redevelopment Working Group
- U.S. Supreme Court Extends Qualified Immunity To Outside Attorneys Temporarily Retained By Public Entities To Conduct Workplace Investigations
- States No Longer Liable for Violations of Self-Care Provision of FMLA
- U.S. District Court Holds That An Eight Percent Wage Reduction Impairing Existing MOUs Did Not Violate The U.S. Constitution's Contract Clause
- California Court of Appeal Holds that an Employee May Be Disciplined for Fabricating Sexual Harassment Allegations
- Court of Appeal Holds that Personnel Investigation Report is Subject to Disclosure
- Daily Journal Recognizes Four Meyers Nave Principals as “Top 25 Municipal Lawyers” in California for 2011
- California Supreme Court Holds Counties May be Bound by Implied Contracts to Provide Health Benefits to Retired Employees
- Take Advantage of the Opportunity to Provide PERB with Feedback Regarding AB 646
- Effective January 1, 2012, Fact Finding Now Required After Mediation and Before Imposing Last, Best and Final Offer
- Governor Brown Signs AB 646 - Fact Finding Now Required Before Imposing Last, Best and Final Offer
- Ninth Circuit Re-Affirms March 2011 Decision Holding Employer’s Rule Against Hiring Job Applicants Who Have Previously Tested Positive for Drug or Alcohol Use Does Not Violate ADA or FEHA
- Daily Journal Recognizes Meyers Nave Principal Edward L. Kreisberg on its Top Labor & Employment Attorneys List in California
- Public Records Act Requires Disclosure of County Retiree Pension Information
- Executive Summary: Bills to Watch
- Court of Appeal Approves Public Employee Termination for Posting Craigslist Sex Ad While Off-Duty
- The Second Appellate District Provides Guidance Regarding an Employer’s Reasonable-Accommodation Duty
- Employer Liability for Biased Supervisor Who Influences Termination
- Fixing the Pension Problem: The Latest Public Scrutiny of Public Sector Wage and Benefit Packages
- Supreme Court Decision Extends Anti-Retaliation Protections to Fiancees
- Title VII Anti-Retaliation Provisions Are Held Applicable to Complaining Employee's Fiancée
- California Supreme Court Confirms Longstanding Rule Concerning Employee Layoffs
- Restraining Orders: Protecting Public Employees When Public Access Becomes Threatening
- Appellate Court Finds Unconstitutional Statutes Favoring Speech Related To Labor Disputes And Holds That A Private Property Owner May Ban Picketing On Its Property
- Meyers Nave Principal Named a 'Top Employment Lawyer' by the Daily Journal
- Nine Meyers Nave Attorneys Recognized as 'Super Lawyers' and 'Rising Stars'
- Definition of “Son or Daughter” in FMLA Expanded by Department of Labor Opinion Letter
- City of San Jose v. Operating Engineers: Public Agencies Must Usually Seek Relief From PERB And Not The Courts When A Threatened Strike Will Endanger Public Welfare
- Meyers Nave Assists the City of Stockton with its Action Plan for Fiscal Sustainability
- US Supreme Court Holds City's Review of Employee Messages on City Pager Was Reasonable in Circumstances, But Avoids Clarifying General Standards
- 9th Circuit Finds that Public Employee Not Speaking As Part of His Official Duties Can Sue For First Amendment Retaliation
- Meyers Nave Investigation Report for the San Jose Evergreen Community College District
- The California Supreme Court Takes a Bite Out of the Finality of Arbitration Awards
- Court of Appeals Gives Deputy Coroners An Unkind Cut
- Police Officers Who May Don and Doff At Home Are Not Engaged in FLSA Compensable Work
- Amicus Brief: City of Ontario v. Quon
- Oakland to Compensate Cops for Dressing Time
- Water Agency Cans General Manager
- Jury Hands Tracy Victory in Wrongful Firing Lawsuit
- IACP Special: Is OIS Video the Next Hot-Button Issue?
- San Ramon Valley Fire Board Grilled by Taxpayers Angry Over Pensions
- Seven Meyers Nave Attorneys Recognized as "Super Lawyers"
- Meyers Nave Secures Important Post-Retirement Medical Benefits Ruling for Orange County
- Ninth Circuit Finally Hears Oral Argument on "Donning and Doffing" Cases
- Court of Appeal Finds Binding Interest Arbitration Statute Unconstitutional
- Public Agency Can Unilaterally Decide to Lay Off Employees
- Meyers Nave Augments Practice Areas with Three New Attorneys
- No Pay for Alleged Pre-Shift Tasks by Police Officers
- BART turns over internal affairs probe to independent, third-party law firm
- Arbitrator OKs Oakland Firing of 'Riders' Cops
- Firing of “Riders” Cops Upheld by Arbitrator
- Final Decision in Oakland Police Officers Association and the City of Oakland v. Mabanag and Siapno
- Amicus Brief: Bamonte, et al v. City of Mesa
- Case Clarifies PERS Regulations with Respect to Pay Deemed "Compensation Earnable"
- Non-Religious Commercial Activities Not Protected as "Religious Exercise" Under RLUIPA
- Supreme Court Grants Review of Spielbauer v. County of Santa Clara
- Individual Proposing Discipline Can Serve as the Skelly Hearing Officer
- Tulare County Superior Court Holds that Compulsory Binding Interest Arbitration is Unconstitutional
- The Court Holds There Was No Duty to Meet and Confer Regarding City's Anti-Racial Profiling Program Affecting Police Officers
- Supreme Court Confirms Doctrine of At-Will Employment
- United States Supreme Court Holds Retaliation Claim Can be Supported by Any Action that Would Dissuade a Reasonable Employee from Filing a Discrimination Complaint
- City of Richmond Victory in Racial Discrimination Case
- Linda Ross, Former Senior Counsel in the San Francisco City Attorney’s Office, Joins Meyers Nave
- Meyers Nave Supports AIDS Walk San Francisco 2011
- Pension Amounts Received by Individuals Must Be Disclosed

